Decoupling Gas and Electricity Prices: What It Means for the UK Market

‘Decoupling’ is back in the headlines, with the government signalling fresh intent to reduce the influence of gas on UK electricity prices. 

The phrase gets used loosely, so it is worth being precise: decoupling does not mean gas stops being used. 

It means electricity prices are set less often by gas, and more often by low-carbon generation under stable pricing frameworks.

The current system

The UK wholesale power market largely operates on marginal pricing. 

Generators are dispatched in order of cost, but the market-clearing price is set by the last (most expensive) unit needed to meet demand. This is often a gas plant.

That matters because gas is still the most flexible source that can respond quickly when demand rises or renewable output drops. 

Even when wind and solar provide a large share of total generation, gas can still be on the margin and therefore set the price.

For context, gas set the UK wholesale electricity price 98% of the time in 2023.

Why the system was designed this way

Marginal pricing is intended to do two things at once: keep the system secure, and keep dispatch efficient.

  1. Security of supply and investment signals: the model is designed to ensure there is always enough generation available to meet demand, particularly from flexible plants that can respond when renewables fall away. That same price signal supports ongoing investment in capacity and infrastructure, including lower-cost renewables.
  2. Efficient dispatch and cost-reflective bidding: it encourages generators to bid close to their cost of production so the cheapest electricity is dispatched first. In practice, this supports competition and helps avoid paying more than necessary for the bulk of electricity when lower-cost generation is available.

A simplified example helps illustrate why prices can still be set by gas even when renewables provide most of the energy:

  • Demand at a point in time: 33GW
  • Available generation:
    • Nuclear: 6GW at £1 (indicative)
    • Solar: 12GW at £1.50 (indicative)
    • Wind: 10GW at £1.50 (indicative)
    • Gas: remaining 3.5GW at £3 (indicative)

Because the system needs that last block of gas to meet demand, gas becomes the marginal unit.

The model is designed so the system always has enough flexible supply, while dispatching the lowest-cost power first. 

However, it can also mean electricity prices remain strongly influenced by gas when gas is needed on the margin.

What ‘decoupling’ could look like in practice

Rather than an overnight redesign of the entire market, the government has indicated a more targeted approach.

The government has described this as’decisive action’ to weaken the link between gas and electricity prices and reduce exposure to future gas price shocks.

In practice, the government is focusing on two immediate levers:

  • Voluntary long-term fixed-price contracts for existing low-carbon generators that are not already on fixed-price arrangements. This is intended to cover around a third of Britain’s power supply, and to provide better insulation when gas prices spike.
  • An updated Electricity Generator Levy, increasing the rate from 45% to 55%, with the stated aim of capturing a greater share of exceptional revenues when gas prices spike and using this to support households and businesses during periods of heightened cost pressure.

This sits alongside a broader trend already underway. 

The government notes that gas has moved from setting the wholesale electricity price around 90% of the time in the early 2020s to around 60% today, with an expectation that this could fall to around half by 2030 as the clean energy transition accelerates.

What this could mean for businesses

If these measures reduce how often gas is setting the marginal power price, there are a few practical implications to consider:

  • Reduced sensitivity to gas price spikes over time
    This would not remove price volatility entirely, but it could moderate the extent to which wholesale electricity prices move in line with short-term gas shocks.
  • A changing risk profile within procurement decisions
    Even with the new policy in place, organisations will still need to manage market risk. This includes ongoing price volatility (especially around geopolitical risk and system tightness), shifting network and policy cost components, and differences in how suppliers price and allocate risk within contracts.
  • A clearer backdrop for electrification planning, where relevant
    If electricity pricing becomes less exposed to gas-driven volatility, it may improve confidence in modelling electrification options. Depending on the site and operating model, this could include:

    • heat pumps
    • electrified communal heating/heat networks
    • PV + battery strategies

These options still rely on site constraints, capex and operational design, but stability in power pricing improves confidence in long-term assumptions.

The takeaway

‘Decoupling’ is best understood as a direction of travel, not a single switch. 

The policy tools being discussed point toward more fixed-price generation and reduced pass-through of gas volatility into power prices, but the timing and magnitude will depend on implementation detail.

At EIC Partnership, the focus is on how these changes may affect contract decisions, budgeting and portfolio planning, and what that could mean for your next renewal. 

There may also be opportunities as the policy develops, particularly where reforms reduce exposure to gas-driven volatility or expand access to more stable pricing structures. 

If you’d like to discuss how ‘decoupling’ might apply to your position, please get in touch.